|
Excerpts from Reflective
Journals | Excerpts
from Literature | References
Every teacher
with some experience under their belt understands the principle of being
flexible and adapting at times. If you are just starting out, take the advice
of those who have paved the way,
and
be ready to change plans according to the needs of your students. Always
be prepared with a lesson plan and specific objectives, but do not be so
rigid that you teach to your agenda instead of to the needs and
interests of the students in your classes and programs.
Excerpts from Reflective Journals
- March 5th, 2002 (Wave I) – “So, my challenge is where to pick
up on Thursday…?! I want to read the book together, do a model perhaps,
get to the rest of the lesson plan that I wasn’t able to, but also not
have them reading this one book over and over and over all weekend with their
child. I’m thinking about having them find a book from the library and
reading it as well, then coming on Tuesday ready to tell us which one they
picked, and how it went. We’ll see…!!!”
- March 26th, 2002 (Wave I) – “These aren’t people who
necessarily have a complete education in their native tongue, and so things
are taking much longer than I had ever anticipated. It gives me the idea that
as PACT becomes something truly polished, it could become something divided
into levels based on the language abilities of the parents…this is thinking
big. And I want to keep thinking big with this—I still believe in its
tremendous worth, despite the poor attendance... I keep thinking also that
I want to arrange for another library visit for Victoria, Marisol, and Estela
to attend. This is what really needs to happen! I want them to take ownership
of this chance to learn and conquer any fears of the library, and choosing
books to read to their children.”
- May 2nd, 2002 (Wave II) – “We began ‘as always’ (I’m
trying to establish a routine with them, which is not always easy when some
people don’t show up every time, or new people come every time, etc)
with me asking for any experiences with trips to the Public Library.”
- May 7th, 2002 (Wave II) – “I didn’t worry too much about
trying to catch them up on what they had missed because I have noticed that
sporadic attendance is such a trend and I can’t always take ten minutes
of a 60-minute class period for catching up—we’d never move forward
that way! But, we did have a natural review that I think helped bring most
everyone ‘up to speed.’”
Excerpts from Literature
- Auerbach, 1990, “We don’t believe that a single, generic, pre-packaged
sequence of themes, language items or activities can possibly fit any set of
circumstances or students. Instead of trying to cover content that has been
predetermined, teachers need to discover content that’s important to
their own students” (p. 1).
- Dilworth, 1995, “Although collaboration is not easy, the rewards are
many. Our abilities as agencies and individuals to remain flexible will serve
us well as we employ the strategies described here [in this chapter], as well
as others… [We] were able to stretch ourselves as educators and develop
a more sophisticated view of the potential of family literacy programs” (p.
31).
- Auerbach, 1997, “In addition to not being ideal, in many cases the
comprehensive model may not be realistic. For many low-budget, small-scale
community initiatives (in churches, adult education centers, preschools, etc.),
a four-component program is financially and logistically impossible. Nevertheless,
it is often precisely in these programs that are struggling to survive where
innovative and effective family literacy practices originate” (pp. 78–79).
- Neuman, Caperelli, and Kee, 1998, “In contrast
to prepackaged curricula and predetermined objectives, programs need to engage
participants
in their
own education, connecting literacy—the discourse practices and ways of
using language—with real-life social issues and concerns in the community” (p.
250).
- Hendrix, 1999, “Rather than rely on a relatively homogenous and homeostatic
model that can be packaged and shipped across the U.S. (or indeed the world),
family literacy educators need to attend to the ever-present and ever-shifting
richness, complexity, and diversity in people’s lives” (p. 345).
References
Auerbach, E. R. (1990). Making meaning, making change:
A guide to participatory curriculum development for adult
ESL and family literacy. Boston: University
of Massachusetts.
Auerbach, E. R. (1997). Reading between the lines. In D.
Taylor (Ed.), Many families, many literacies: An international declaration
of principles (pp.
71–81).
Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Trade.
Dilworth, J. (1995). Lessons in collaboration:
An adult educator’s perspective. In G. Weinstein-Shr & E. Quintero
(Eds.), Immigrant learners and their
families (pp. 19–31). McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics
and Delta Systems.
Hendrix, S. (1999). Family literacy education—Panacea
or false promise? Journal of Adolescent and Adult
Literacy,
43, 338 –346.
Neuman, S. B., Caperelli, B. J., & Kee, C.
(1998). Literacy learning, a family matter. The Reading Teacher,
52, 244–252
[Previous] | [Next]
|