Ling 600
Anderson

VIRTUAL CLASS DISCUSSION
GRADING CRITERIA FORM

Name
Score: /25

Evaluation Criteria:

  1. Includes a self-reflection of the assignment.
  2. Initial response to the class reading made on-line by the deadline.
  3. Initial response deemed to be reasonable and well thought out.
  4. Follow-up response to the class responses made on-line by the deadline.
  5. Follow-up response deemed to be reasonable and well thought out

NOTE: Forward a copy of this form in a separate email to the instructor.

Grading:

23-25 points Exceptionally well thought out responses. Meets all the above criteria.

20-22 points Very good insights. Fulfilled the assignment, but lacking in a few of the above areas.

18-19 points Good ideas, but need more attention. Deficient in several of the above areas.

0-17 points Less than satisfactory. Deficient in most of the above areas.

Self-Reflection Comments: